Introduction. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1rnJames A. Hampton and Yoad WinterrnCognitively Plausible Theories of Concept Composition . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9rnLawrence W. BarsalournCompositionality and Concepts—A Perspective from FormalrnSemantics and Philosophy of Language. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31rnFrancis Jeffry PelletierrnCompositionality and Concepts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 95rnJames A. HamptonrnTypicality Knowledge and the Interpretation of Adjectives . . . . . . . . . . . 123rnChoonkyu LeernConcept Typicality and the Interpretation of Plural PredicaternConjunction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 139rnEva B. PoortmanrnCritical Typicality: Truth Judgements and Compositionalityrnwith Plurals and Other Gradable Concepts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 163rnYoad WinterrnComplement Coercion as the Processing of Aspectual Verbs:rnEvidence from Self-paced Reading and fMRI. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 191rnYao-Ying Lai, Cheryl Lacadie, Todd Constable, Ashwini Deornand Maria Mercedes PiñangornConceptual Combination, Property Inclusion,rnand the Aristotelian-Thomistic View of Concepts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 223rnChristina L. Gagné, Thomas L. Spalding and Matthew Kostelecky